| Author | Messages | |
weadjust
 Posts:32

 | | 01/09/2008 6:12 PM |
| Lawyers withdraw from Scruggs' case The Associated Press • January 9, 2008
[script removed]
function NewWindow(height,width,url)
{window.open(url,"ShowProdWindow","menubars=0,scrollbars=1,resizable=1,height="+height+",width="+width);
}
[script removed]
Members of a law firm that was searched by federal agents last month have resigned as defense attorneys in the high-profile bribery case involving wealthy lawyer Richard "Dickie" Scruggs. U.S. District Judge Neal Biggers on Tuesday granted the request by Joey Langston and Billy Quin of the Langston Law Firm to withdraw as attorneys for Scruggs, according to court records filed Tuesday in federal court in Oxford.
Scruggs and four others, including his son and law partner Zach, were indicted Nov. 28 on charges they conspired to bribe a judge for a favorable ruling in a case involving disputed legal fees.
One of Langston’s former law partners, Timothy Balducci, pleaded guilty Dec. 4 to conspiracy in the bribery case and is helping investigators.
On Dec. 10, the FBI searched the Langston law firm in Booneville. Agents took records from cases that Balducci worked on before he left the firm more than a year earlier, attorney Tony Farese, who represents Zach Scruggs in the bribery case, said at the time.
FBI officials would not say what they were looking for.
Assistant U.S. Attorney David A. Sanders, in a response filed Tuesday to Scruggs’ request documents from the government’s investigation, declined to release copies of the application and affidavit related to the search warrant issued for Langston’s law office.
“These documents concern an entirely separate investigation, and thus, cannot be produced,” Sanders said in court documents.
Langston and Quin did not say specifically in court records why they wanted to withdraw but noted that other attorneys have appeared in court on behalf of Scruggs and Scruggs’ defense would not be harmed by their withdrawal.
Quin and Langston did not respond to several messages left Tuesday by The Associated Press.
John Keker, a San Francisco attorney who represents Scruggs in the bribery case, would not comment on why Langston and Quin would no longer be working on the case.
Scruggs, a brother-in-law of former Sen. Trent Lott has made millions from tobacco and asbestos litigation. He reportedly made $848 million for his part in brokering a multibillion-dollar settlement with tobacco companies in the mid-1990s. That case was portrayed in the 1999 movie “The Insider.”
The bribery charges arose from a lawsuit filed against Scruggs by another law firm that wants a bigger cut of at least $26.5 million in legal fees from a mass settlement of policyholder lawsuits over Hurricane Katrina damage. | | | |
| weadjust
 Posts:32

 | | 01/09/2008 6:14 PM |
| UPDATE: Scruggs' case attorneys changing, again 1/9/2008 4:21:31 PM Daily Journal
By Patsy R. Brumfield Daily Journal
OXFORD – Two more attorney changes in the fast-moving case of famed litigator Richard "Dickie" Scruggs became public Wednesday.
• Oxford attorney Ken Coghlan, who once defended a Scruggs co-conspirator, asked the court to approve him as an addition to Scruggs' defense team.
• Ashland attorney Tony Farese, who is new attorney for Booneville trial lawyer Joey Langston, asked the court to allow him to withdraw as legal defense for Scrugg's attorney son Zach.
Courthouse speculation from Oxford today continues to focus on whether Langston was indicted by a sitting grand jury earlier this week and may be cooperating with the government. Farese was seen to be called out of a state court matter earlier in the week just a block away from the federal courthouse to come to Langston's aide. It's not believed prosecutors are interested in Langston about their case against Scruggs and four others, accused Nov. 28 of trying to bribe a judge for a favorable ruling in a $26.5 million Katrina legal fees lawsuit. But that's anything but a certainty at this stage.
It's widely believed the answers to those questions will come within days as sealed documents are made public.
Coghlan initially represented co-defendant, former state Auditor Steve Patterson. He withdrew several weeks ago in favor of Greenwood attorney Hiram Eastland Jr.
Why he has returned to the case as Scruggs' attorney is not clear,courthouse observers tell the Daily Journal.
Farese's withdrawal, however, may signal some kind of conflict between Langston's testimony and the Scruggs case.
Scruggs, Zach Scruggs, Patterson, Oxford attorney Sidney Backstrom and New Albany attorney Timothy Balducci were indicted in the judicial bribery case.
They all pleaded not guilty, then Balducci turned around, pleaded guilty to one count and began cooperating with the government.
At midday Tuesday, more questions than answers were swirling around the federal courthouse here.
| | | |
| sbeau4014 Founding Member Homeless Gypsy's-Fulltime RV travelers
 Posts:267

 | | 01/10/2008 11:02 AM |
| This case has taken on a life of it's own with Scrugg's original attorney's office being raided by the FBI, that attorney and some of his employees plus a judge who was involved in a big case involving Scruggs were asked to talk to the grand jury, and the rumors and speculation surrounding possible additional indictments/pleas agreements are flying all over the place. Keep in mind a chunk of them are rumors at this time, but based on all the lawyer juggling, and motions filed surrounding this case, it will only get bigger versus settle down. On a side note, the federal judge in one of the high profile SF cases where Scruggs used to be involved (he withdrew from all Katrina cases personally due to other problems he has had of late) just ruled that SF can take the sworn testimony from Dickie and his son Zach in reference to their relationship/timelines/ etc with their dealings with the Ridgsby sisters (of the stolen SF documents fame). Judge Senter states the Scruggs wore "two hats" in their dealing with them, as employer and also as attorney, and there is a chunk of that dealing that is not protected under the attorney client priviledge. Also of note, it appears that the Ridgsby sisters may be back in the market for a job as the Katrina Law Group (formally known as the Scruggs Katrina Group) has let it be known that they will no longer be paying the sisters their $150,000 per year, per person salaries as "consultants" for the group. It is unknow if ole Dickie will be paying them direct out of his own pocket, even though he is no longer associated with that group. If there is any possibility that their dealings with Scruggs and the MS attorney general is not perfectly legal and ethical (as per state bar standards), it might be in Mr Scrugg's best interest to keep them happy and on his side. but of course if all their dealings are above board and everything they did was completely of their own doings without him or the attorney general giving them any guidance to do so, he would have no worries about them no longer getting their pay for the "consulting work" they were doing, and I'm not real sure, but I'd guess that that consulting work may not be needed too much anymore. It may come to pass that that relationship with the sisters and paying them as consultants may cause some harm to the KLG on these insurance cases. They have both been deposed and the transcript of those depositions are available by link if anyone is interested in reading them. Pretty long, but overall a good read. Below are four links to law blogs/insurance blogs that keep up with the changes in "Scruggsmania" and they are very interesting to read. They also cover other issues of law, insurance and MS politics. Good way to keep up on legal changes in our industry (and also non insurance issues) around the country. http://www.insurancecoverageblog.com/ http://folo.wordpress.com/ http://www.yallpolitics.com/ http://www.overlawyered.com/ | | | |
| weadjust
 Posts:32

 | | 01/10/2008 1:39 PM |
| Scruggs case: Pleas, deals may be ‘clear’ Monday 1/10/2008 6:39:59 AM Daily Journal
By Patsy R. Brumfield Daily Journal
OXFORD – Monday is expected to be a busy day at federal court, say sources close to the judicial bribery case that’s ensnared famed litigator Richard “Dickie” Scruggs and four others.
Reliable sources say it’s highly likely some documents will be unsealed Monday, indicating many details of what’s been going on behind the scenes relating to the Nov. 28 indictments of Scruggs, his lawyer son Zach, legal associate Sidney Backstrom, former state Auditor Steven Patterson and New Albany attorney Timothy Balducci.
They are accused of trying to bribe Circuit Judge Henry Lackey of Calhoun County for a favorable ruling in a $26.5 million Katrina legal fees lawsuit.
Many aspects of the case “will become clear” Monday, one person close to the case said.
What isn’t clear yet is what’s in those documents, but the sources say they could reveal some guilty pleas and federal cooperation by one or more of the defendants, besides Balducci, who Dec. 4 changed his not-guilty plea to guilty on one count and has been assisting prosecutors.
Scruggs, his son, Backstrom and Patterson have insisted upon their innocence. Calls to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for more information were not answered.
However, courthouse observers say Patterson may have worked out a deal with prosecutors. His attorney, Hiram Eastland Jr. of Greenwood, declined to comment on the possibility.
A busy day Also on Monday, a hearing is likely on issues relating to the lawsuit that is at the center of the Scruggs case allegations. The Jones, Funderberg, Sessums, Peterson & Lee law firm of Jackson sued parties to The Scruggs Katrina Group, saying it was entitled to more than what SKG offered after working together on many Katrina insurance case settlements.
At issue Monday could be a Jones motion dated Dec. 7 asking for sanctions and damages against the Scruggs group for the court to take possession of all the Katrina case money and determine the damages because the judicial bribery accusations have “forever tainted” the original lawsuit.
The Scruggs group has countered, asking the court to delay its decision on Jones until its judicial bribery case is resolved.
Legal talk around Oxford’s heralded Square on Wednesday also posed questions about whether well-known Booneville attorney Joey Langston had been indicted by the sitting federal grand jury, with some attorneys saying they had been told he had entered a plea and was cooperating with prosecutors. No one directly connected with Langston would comment publicly about that.
When Scruggs was indicted Nov. 28, Langston was his lead attorney. On Dec. 4, Langston associate William M. Quin II of Booneville became co-counsel for Scruggs. Three days later, Langston asked the court to admit California mega-attorney John Keker and three associates to the defense team. Dec. 10, the FBI raided Langston’s office seeking documents reportedly not related to the Scruggs investigation.
Tuesday, Langston, Quin and the firm got court approval to terminate their legal obligations to Scruggs.
Musical chairs Wednesday, two attorneys connected with the case tried to make some changes, but Senior Judge Neal Biggers Jr. said no, at least for the time being.
• Oxford attorney Ken Coghlan, who once represented Scruggs’s alleged co-conspirator Patterson, asked the court to approve him as an addition to Scruggs’ defense team. On Dec. 17, Coghlan stepped aside as Patterson’s attorney as Eastland moved into that role.
• Ashland attorney Tony Farese, who is likely to move into the role of new attorney for Langston, asked the court to allow him to withdraw as legal defense for Scruggs’ attorney son Zach. No legal substitute was apparent late Wednesday.
Speculation about Farese’s arrangement with Langston rose earlier this week when Farese was seen to be called out of a state court matter just a block away from the federal courthouse reportedly to come to Langston’s aid. A federal grand jury is at work at the courthouse. An earlier indication of their connections came Dec. 10 when Farese was seen at Langston’s Booneville law firm as the FBI searched the offices for information reportedly unconnected with the Scruggs investigation.
| | | |
| weadjust
 Posts:32

 | | 01/11/2008 2:39 PM |
| | BREAKING NEWS: First public clue Patterson has pleaded in Scruggs case 1/11/2008 12:45:06 PM
| |
OXFORD – When lawyers filed more paperwork Friday in the federal judicial bribery case that’s enshared famed litigator Richard “Dickie” Scruggs and four others, the opening paragraph may have said more than usual.
Co-defendant Steven Patterson’s name wasn’t listed with others indicted with him Nov. 28 – Scruggs, his son Zach and Oxford legal associate Sidney Backstrom. Also not listed was New Albany Timothy Balducci, another co-defendant, who pleaded guilty Dec. 4 and is known to be working with the government.
Courthouse observers had told the Daily Journal earlier this week they believed Patterson had changed his innocent plea to guilty after cutting a deal for leniency with the federal prosecutors.
That action was confirmed Wednesday from another source close to the case.
The new U.S. District Court document, filed Friday, may be further evidence of Patterson’s flip.
The five men were accused of trying to bribe a circuit judge for a favorable ruling in a $26.5 million Katrina legal fees lawsuit.
| | | |
| weadjust
 Posts:32

 | | 01/12/2008 1:26 PM |
| ONLINEXTRA:Scruggs update 1/12/2008 10:14:11 AM Daily Journal
By Patsy R. Brumfield Daily Journal
OXFORD – Federal prosecutors still haven’t given defense attorneys information about the search warrant for Booneville attorney Joey Langston’s office, among numerous other documents, videotapes and wiretaps they say the government has.
The search warrant for the Langston Law Firm, a new defense motion states, calls for “all records relating” to two cases in which the firm represented famed Oxford litigator Richard “Dickie” Scruggs.
Scruggs, his son Zach, Oxford attorney Sidney Backstrom, former state Auditor Steven Patterson and New Albany attorney Timothy Balducci were indicted Nov. 28, accused of trying to bribe a judge for a favorable ruling in a $26.5 million Katrina legal fees lawsuit. Balducci pleaded guilty and is cooperating with the government.
A source close to the case told the Daily Journal on Wednesday that Patterson has changed his innocent plea for leniency and is helping prosecutors. His status and other sealed documents are expected to become public Monday, when one legal observer said more issues of the case will be clarified.
In a reportedly unrelated case, sources also say Langston was indicted and is cooperating with investigators. Langston’s attorney, Tony Farese of Ashland,said.
The Scruggs defense motion filed Friday in U.S. District Court in Oxford asks for seven categories of documents, statements or recordings. It asks the court to order the government to produce them. Late Thursday, Senior Judge Neal Biggers Jr. ordered both sides to negotiate these issues before he holds a hearing about it Wednesday.
The document is interesting because it notes specific wiretaps and recordings of conversations, telephone calls and meetings between Balducci and Judge Henry Lackey, as well as e-mails and information that may be helpful to the defense team.
It also asks for a log of all calls recorded during wiretaps on Balducci and Patterson.
| | | |
| weadjust
 Posts:32

 | | 01/13/2008 2:30 PM |
| Another lawyer pleads guiltyCourt papers filed point to ScruggsJerry Mitchell • jmitchell@clarionledger.com • January 13, 2008 Booneville lawyer Joey Langston has pleaded guilty to corruption charges, admitting he tried to influence a Mississippi judge, sometimes with help from wealthy lawyer Dickie Scruggs, already indicted in the case, according to documents filed in federal court. Langston, who recently withdrew as one of Scruggs' attorneys, entered the plea in front of U.S. District Judge Michael Mills in Oxford. Langston's attorney, Anthony Farese, could not be reached for comment. The statement could shake the very foundation of the legal profession in Mississippi, said Oxford lawyer Grady Tollison, past president of the Mississippi Bar Association and president-elect of the Southeastern American Board of Trial Advocates. "Everybody I honor and respect is offended that anybody would try to corrupt the greatest system of justice in the world. I find it heinous." Although what's happened could end up helping his clients who are suing Scruggs, Tollison said when he first heard the corruption allegation, "I felt like I was being punched in the stomach. Mississippi is once again made a butt of jokes. That offends me." On Nov. 28, a federal grand jury indicted Scruggs, his son, Zach Scruggs, and law partner Sidney Backstrom, all of Oxford, and former state Auditor Steve Patterson. All have pleaded not guilty to judicial bribery charges. If convicted on all counts, each faces up to 75 years in prison and $1.5 million in fines. Scruggs is the brother-in-law of former Sen. Trent Lott. Lawyer Tim Balducci, who pleaded guilty to the same bribery charges Scruggs now faces, admitted he approached Lafayette County Circuit Judge Henry Lackey in March about taking a bribe in a $26 million legal-fees dispute involving litigation on behalf of Hurricane Katrina victims. Lackey contacted authorities and began cooperating with the FBI. Eventually, Balducci told authorities he gave the judge a $40,000 bribe to rule in Scruggs' favor. In delivering his bribe, Balducci is recorded on tape as saying, "Over the last five or six years there ... are bodies buried that ... (Scruggs) and I know where ... (they) are." Balducci since has told the FBI one of those "bodies" is a 1994 Hinds County lawsuit filed against Scruggs by two of Scruggs' former law partners, Alwyn Luckey and William Roberts Wilson Jr., over attorney fees in litigation against asbestos manufacturers. Scruggs had successfully represented the state in the asbestos litigation for then-Attorney General Mike Moore. Langston's law firm did not give a reason for withdrawing from Scruggs' defense. On Dec. 10, the FBI served a search warrant at Langston's law office, where Balducci previously worked, seeking documents related to that attorneys' fees lawsuit as well as documents regarding payments to Jackson lawyer Ed Peters, who played no known role in the case. In 2001, Peters retired as Hinds County district attorney. In his statement to authorities, Langston said he helped Scruggs try to influence Circuit Judge Bobby DeLaughter, who heard the case. DeLaughter, a former assistant district attorney under Peters, has repeatedly said he took no bribe. "The hardest part of this is not being able to defend myself, but I just can't comment on it," he said Saturday. About a year after the lawsuit was filed, the Internal Revenue Service disallowed some of Wilson's deductions on his income tax filing, causing him to owe taxes, said his attorney, Vicki Slater of Jackson. Despite being in bankruptcy, Wilson paid 100 percent of those taxes, she said. The state Tax Commission talked of pursuing a case against Wilson, but the Bankruptcy Court blocked any action, she said. In 2001, Scruggs' attorneys took some of Wilson's accounting documents received through discovery to Peters, then Hinds County district attorney, asking Peters to pursue a tax case against Wilson. Later, one of Wilson's lawyers met with Peters, and Slater said Peters told that lawyer that a "high-ranking public official" asked him to prosecute Wilson. Peters could not be reached for comment. Wilson did nothing to warrant criminal prosecution, Slater said. "All of this was to help Scruggs in his lawsuit." In 2005, a federal judge ordered Scruggs to pay Luckey more than $17 million. Wilson's case wound up back in Circuit Court before DeLaughter. Scruggs' attorneys expressed concerns DeLaughter's former law partner, Bill Kirksey, was involved in that lawsuit and decided to hire Peters, according to statements Scruggs' lawyers have given federal authorities. Peters asked for $50,000 in cash for his services, according to the statements, and because Langston didn't have $50,000 in cash, Balducci supplied it. But Scruggs' lawyers never listed Peters as an attorney of record in the case. According to statements, Peters was eventually given a total of $1 million to influence DeLaughter in the case. The statements show DeLaughter did not receive any of that money. In January 2006, special master Bobby Sneed made recommendations that led Wilson's attorneys to seek more than $15 million in fees from the asbestos litigation. Three days after that decision, Scruggs installed Langston as lead counsel, assisted by Balducci. A month later DeLaughter, the judge hearing the case, ended up rejecting most of the special master's conclusions, concluding Wilson was owed nothing beyond belated payments by Scruggs totaling nearly $1.5 million. In a May 29, 2006, e-mail obtained by federal authorities, Zach Scruggs told his father's attorney in the case, John Jones of Jackson, that "you could file briefs on a napkin right now and get it granted." Jones responded in his e-mail, "You have misconceptions about Joey and Tim that I hope ultimately do not need to be explored. ... If we win, it will be because the law says we win." At one point, Peters told Scruggs' attorneys what DeLaughter would really like is a federal judgeship, according to statements. DeLaughter was among a number of nominees Lott received recommendations for in letters and calls from lawyers and others. Lott did call DeLaughter as a courtesy but recommended Sul Ozerden. President Bush nominated Ozerden in September 2006, and the Senate confirmed him in April. When both sides in the Wilson-Scruggs case finally met for trial in August 2006, according to the transcript, DeLaughter told lawyers there was nothing left but a "negative balance." Without actual damages, it's impossible for the jury to assess punitive damages, "which leaves us with a trial by jury to determine bragging rights," DeLaughter said. Both sides settled the case. DeLaughter has said he was never approached in the case and if he had been, he would have notified the authorities. He has said he isn't surprised the FBI is looking at the case because of Balducci's statement. Another of Wilson's attorneys, Charlie Merkel of Clarksdale, said the FBI asked him whether Peters had played any role in the 1994 litigation. "He's never been a party to it," Merkel said he told agents. The charges against Scruggs and others have complicated proceedings and may further delay the Katrina litigation. "It's a shame because this litigation affects hundreds of people," Slater said. "Now they're twisting in the wind again. That's the real travesty of it." | | | |
| Gale Hawkins PowerClaim.com
 Posts:335

 | | 01/13/2008 2:45 PM |
| | I noticed it said the FORMER Sen. Trent Lott. This is the first time I saw Trent's relationship being mentioned since his brother in law was charged in this case. It sounds like the lawyer profession may see that Scruggs fries over this if possible. | | | |
| weadjust
 Posts:32

 | | 01/15/2008 5:42 PM |
| | UPDATE: Patterson enters guilty plea in Miss. judicial bribery case 1/15/2008 12:51:41 PM
Daily Journal | |
By HOLBROOK MOHR
The Associated Press
OXFORD - Former state auditor Steve Patterson pleaded guilty Tuesday to conspiring with prominent attorney Richard "Dickie" Scruggs and others to attempt to bribe a state court judge.
The alleged conspiracy was an attempt to secure a federal ruling in a dispute over legal fees from Hurricane Katrina litigation, according to federal prosecutors.
Patterson, wearing a dark suit, white shirt and black-and-yellow tie, appeared before U.S. District Judge Neal Biggers Jr. in federal court here for the about 45-minute hearing.
"I never set out to corruptly bribe a judge," Patterson told the court. "However, I do understand that once I joined it and the cat was out of the bag, I was a coconspirator."
No date was set for sentencing.
Patterson, 56, was indicted in November along with Scruggs, Scruggs' son and attorneys Timothy Balducci and Sidney Backstrom on charges they conspired to pay Circuit Judge Henry Lackey at least $40,000 for a favorable ruling in the fees case. The government said Lackey informed federal authorities of the alleged bribe overture and cooperated with investigators.
| | | |
| weadjust
 Posts:32

 | | 01/16/2008 2:46 PM |
| | UPDATE: Scruggs trial delayed until March 31 1/16/2008 11:47:15 AM
Daily Journal | |
OXFORD – The trial of noted Oxford attorney Richard “Dickie” Scruggs on attempted bribery charges has been delayed until March 31, a judge decided Wednesday.
The trial previously was set for Feb. 25, but Biggers agreed to the delay because the government was not ready with materials that the defense said it needed, and because Scruggs attorney John Keker has a scheduling conflict because of a trial in California.
Scruggs and four others were indicted in November on charges of attempting to bribe Judge Henry Lackey.
Scruggs has pleaded not guilty.
| | | |
| weadjust
 Posts:32

 | | 01/18/2008 1:40 PM |
| | We tried to influence judge, Langston says 1/18/2008 9:17:49 AM
Daily Journal | |
By Patsy R. Brumfield
Daily Journal
OXFORD - If Booneville attorney Joey Langston was telling the truth Jan. 7, at least three former or current public officials have some explaining to do.
Langston pleaded guilty to conspiring to bribe Hinds Circuit Judge Bobby DeLaughter to get a favorable ruling in a civil lawsuit.
In the 22-page transcript of his plea hearing before Chief Judge Michael Mills, Langston said he, Timothy Balducci and Steven Patterson paid $50,000 in cash to former Hinds County District Attorney Ed Peters to influence DeLaughter, a longtime friend of Peters'.
In that pleading, which was made available Thursday, he claims they were acting on behalf of famed Oxford attorney Richard 'Dickie' Scruggs to resolve a lawsuit about the division of legal fees in a case against asbestos manufacturers.
Also insinuated is a link with Washington, D.C., to put DeLaughter's name up for a federal judgeship, something Langston said he knew the judge was interested in.
A judicial nomination of this kind occurs only through a U.S. senator, and then-Sen. Trent Lott is Scrugg's brother-in-law.
"Scruggs told Langston to let the Judge know that if he ruled in his favor he would pass his name along for consideration regarding the federal judgeship," the transcript reads. "Langston then informed Peters, who, in turn, passed the information along to Judge DeLaughter."
Mills asked Langston, "Did you do what he just stated?"
"Yes, Your Honor," the 50-year-old Langston responded.
Calls to Peters, DeLaughter and Scrugg's lead attorney John Keker for a response were not answered by late Thursday. DeLaughter has publicly insisted that he never took anything in this matter.
Lott spokesman Bret Boyles said Scruggs had "zero involvement" in the judicial selection process, noting Lott had already made up his mind to appoint someone from Gulfport. The ultimate decision in judicial appointments lies with President Bush.
In the end, the government said, Peters got another $950,000 for his services. And Langston agreed it happened this way.
They also claimed DeLaughter e-mailed Peters a rough draft of the opinion he planned to enter. And Langston, Balducci and Patterson would be able to see it before any final version was filed.
Langston had better be telling the truth: He has sworn an oath before his testimony and knows he can be charged with perjury and anything else the government believes he's done.
Also Monday, Patterson agreed to plead guilty to trying to bribe a judge in another case the one for which he, Balducci, Scruggs, Scruggs' son Zach and Oxford attorney Sidney Backstrom were indicted Nov. 28.
According to Patterson and Langston's plea agreements, they cannot be charged with anything else related or unrelated to these matters. Their sentences will await how well they cooperate with the government.
Dickie Scruggs has not been charged with anything
relating to Langston's story about DeLaughter.
| | | |
| stormcrow
where ever the winds blow
 Posts:176


 | | 01/18/2008 7:00 PM |
| Bowling for lawyers Mississippi style. The biggest question seems to be you is indited next or who flips next. And who is P L Blake and why did Dickie Scruggs pay him $20,000,000. | | Still sliding down the razorblade of life. | |
| sbeau4014 Founding Member Homeless Gypsy's-Fulltime RV travelers
 Posts:267

 | | 01/19/2008 10:14 AM |
| | That P.L. Blake figure is in reality $50,000,000 from Dickie, I think $10,000,000 up front and the rest to be paid out over 20 years and I think that happened back in the 90's sometime (tobacco trial time). In sworn testimony niether Blake nor Scruggs could remember the exact nature of the deal that Blake was to do for that amount of $$, and they did not believe there was anything in writing about it. The best explanation as to what Mr. Blake did to earn that kind of cash came from Dickie himself wherein he stated that Mr. Blake cut out newspaper articles and kept them informed about the political environment and the state and federal politics. I may be a little naïve, but I think that's a pretty generous payment for cutting out newspaper articles and telling the attorneys what is going on in politics. If a person was suspicious in nature, they could suspect this amount of cash may have been used and is being used or possibly some illegal or unethical purposes, maybe even as a slush fund that some people may remember from the Watergate days. Have been an awful lot of allegations as of late that Mr. Scruggs may have attempted to bribe judges for favorable rulings, and some of the players in all of that mess that is ongoing in Mississippi have alleged that Mr. Blake was involved in some of this shenanigans. That coupled with the fact that Mr. Blake previously pled guilty to bribery does not look good for Mr. Scruggs. If I were a gambling man I would wager that Mr. Blake will become heavily involved in the federal investigation of corruption, and it will be real interesting to see how that $50 million is accounted for in Mr. Blake's taxes. It would also be interesting to see what Mr. Scruggs showed on his taxes for this $50 million. | | | |
| weadjust
 Posts:32

 | | 01/20/2008 2:24 PM |
| Article in the NY Times about Dickie and P.L. Blake.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/business/20blake.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin | | | |
| Tom Toll Life Member Moderator
 Posts:882

 | | 01/20/2008 7:12 PM |
| This is becoming an amazing case and proves that greed, breeds greed. If all are guilty, I hope they get very long prison sentences. People like you and I have worked hard all our lives and in most cases cannot retire in wealth. Now take some conniving, dishonest, slick talking lawyer and he sits on snob hill looking down upon us poor slaves. I wish they would re-open the tobacco case and see what went on there. If you think this has made a hard working ,honest old adjuster mad, your very right. Many of us have done without through the years to feed, house, and clothe our families and this should be upsetting you too, I hope. There are some good and decent lawyers that are a necessity of society, but 90% of them are ambulance, class action chasing greed mongers. Whew, that made me feel better. | | Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts. | |
| Tom Toll Life Member Moderator
 Posts:882

 | | 01/20/2008 7:17 PM |
| This is becoming an amazing case and proves that greed, breeds greed. If all are guilty, I hope they get very long prison sentences. People like you and I have worked hard all our lives and in most cases cannot retire in wealth. Now take some conniving, dishonest, slick talking lawyer and he sits on snob hill looking down upon us poor slaves. I wish they would re-open the tobacco case and see what went on there. If you think this has made a hard working , honest old adjuster mad, your very right. Many of us have done without through the years to feed, house, and clothe our families and this should be upsetting you too, I hope. There are some good and decent lawyers that are a necessity of society, but 90% of them are ambulance and class action chasing greed mongers. Whew, that made me feel better. | | Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts. | |
| BobH Gold Member California, Central Coast
 Posts:373


 | | 01/20/2008 8:51 PM |
| Posted By Tom Toll There are some good and decent lawyers that are a necessity of society, but 90% of them are ambulance, class action chasing greed mongers. What's the difference between an HONEST attorney, and BIG-FOOT? (there have been reported sightings of big-foot) | | | |
| steph9176
Dallas
 Posts:22

 | | 01/21/2008 11:17 PM |
| So who thinks DIckie will actually do time for this? Just curious. | | | |
| Gale Hawkins PowerClaim.com
 Posts:335

 | | 01/21/2008 11:55 PM |
| | He seems to have a way with judges. | | | |
| stormcrow
where ever the winds blow
 Posts:176


 | | 01/22/2008 10:54 AM |
| If I was a bettn man. I'd bet he will do real time. What i do wonder is who is paying the Rigsby sisters legal bills now they are no longer on the Scrugg's payroll? Hope they hung onto some of that $6250 biweekly income (each). I suspect we will watch many more lawyers tumble in Ms. before the dust settles, this seems to be bigger the Dickie and Zach. | | Still sliding down the razorblade of life. | |
|
|