Home ::  Bulletins :  Roster :  Resumes :  Forums :  Links :  Chat :  OTR :  Events :  Search CADO :  Contact Us   Search the Forum Archive 


NOTICE: We are no longer using this forum for discussions. Please follow the links to the new forums. Catastrophe Central-The Adjuster's Forum :  Community Center- Forums
New Site Registration  : New Site Login




RE: Need some help if possible

 
Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Public Forum] >> General >> RE: Need some help if possible Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]


NOTICE: We are no longer using this forum for discussions. Please follow the links to the new forums. Catastrophe Central-The Adjuster's Forum :  Community Center- Forums
New Site Registration  : New Site Login

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Need some help if possible - 2/19/2006 8:34:32 AM   
okclarryd


Posts: 612
Joined: 4/19/2004
Home base: Oklahoma City, Ok
Status: offline
Also, and I've seen this in other replies or postings, the definitions used in the various sections of the policy cannot be transferred to another section for the convenience of the reader. 

The term "occurrence" does not occur in first party coverage.

This is not the first occurrence of this occurring here on CADO.

_____________________________

LARRY D HARDIN
This is a Forum Archive Post. Click here to visit the current forum. Post #: 41
RE: Need some help if possible - 2/19/2006 2:08:00 PM   
trader

 

Posts: 1200
Joined: 4/19/2004
Home base: Houston, TX
Status: offline
This goes to basics of insurance principals of fire and casualty insurance.

If you owned an insurance company : would you insure "bad results" of events that could be; foreseen, expected and not accidental ?  The answer is always NO.  Now if you are an adjuster working for this insurance company, why would  you assume anything has changed. ?

< Message edited by trader -- 2/19/2006 3:53:13 PM >
This is a Forum Archive Post. Click here to visit the current forum. Post #: 42
RE: Need some help if possible - 2/19/2006 3:18:09 PM   
Catmandale

 

Posts: 48
Joined: 4/19/2004
Home base: Bakersfield, CA
Status: offline
My take on this: 

The hailstorm damage was an accidental direct physical loss, covered by the policy, subject to policy provisions, for the parties having an insurable interest in the insured property.

The liability issue at hand is the claim presented by the new owners against the old owners. And/or the new owners against the inspector, real estate agent, escrow company, etc...

Regarding the hail damage to the house, the new owner has no standing with the carrier insuring the home at the time of the loss.

The questions of liability and negligence are subject to the legal environment where the argument is venued.

If we are talking a few thousand dollars for a reroof, the cost of fees may soon exceed any potential benefit.

Dale
This is a Forum Archive Post. Click here to visit the current forum. Post #: 43
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Public Forum] >> General >> RE: Need some help if possible Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





!! You are viewing a post in the forum archive.
NOTICE: We are no longer using this forum for discussions. Please follow the links to the new forums. Catastrophe Central-The Adjuster's Forum :  Community Center- Forums
New Site Registration  : New Site Login

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



User Agreement | Privacy Statement| Contact |Copyright 1995 - 2006 CatAdjuster.org. All rights reserved.


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.076