|
CATdawg -> RE: Roofing or Landscaping? (8/18/2006 8:07:08 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: paigetex The wood shakes were also covered in moss, a condition that the owner of the building stated grew from buttermilk having been poured all over the roof when it was new to stimulate the fungi growth. She asked (laughingly) whether or not her policy covered the buttermilk, and the labor required to pour it, over the new roof when it was installed. I (laughingly) responded.... No. Since any growth at all on wood has deleterious effects, I'm wondering what is the justification behind promoting growth. Surely any benefit claimed of "moss growth": for instance, protecting a wood shake from UV or weather; would be more than outweighed by the moisture-retentive properties of the moss and consequent micro-environment conducive to the growth of even more destructive organisms? This thread has made my day! Thank you, everyone, for the comic relief!
|
|
|
|