 |  |  |  |
Saturday, September 06, 2008 |
|  | | |
|
|
| |  | | Author | Messages | |
Stephanie W
Dallas
 Posts:30

 | | 02/03/2008 10:53 PM |
| I noticed someone mentioned forming a union for adjusters in another thread. How many of you think this would help the Cat profession? Honestly I don't see this flying with the insurance companies. I'm sure they will try to crush it. It will only drive costs up for them. I can see where it would help get more professionalism into the industry but I can also seeing it turn into a monster. | | | |
| Steve Beaumont Founding Member Adjuster Homeless Gypsy's-Fulltime RV travelers
 Posts:284

 | | 02/03/2008 11:30 PM |
| | I have heard the talk/threat of unionization for over 25 years and my guess is it has as much chance of coming about now as it did 25 years ago. I for one would have nothing to do with it, but it is each person's personal preference. When unions started they were a very good idea and needed for the areas that they were developed, but cat adjusting is not anything like the industries where they came about. My gut feelings about them is that they have abused their power/standing in too many instances and I have zero desire to pay a union part of my pay for what they would claim to be able to offer me in this business. I don't see any benefit gained for me personally (pretty sellfish I know) but that is how I feel about it. | | | |
| Stephanie W
Dallas
 Posts:30

 | | 02/03/2008 11:33 PM |
| I think I agree with you, Steve. I think it would cost Cat adjusters more than it is worth since the work can be so slim. Unions were useful back in the day when there were no labor laws. | | | |
| Jim Gary Adjuster Mineral Wells, Tx
 Posts:235


 | | 02/04/2008 10:19 AM |
| Part of being independent is just that, being independent. A union is just the opposite of independent. The only real issue I see in this business, is the lack of work recently, and a union cannot help that. I've seen several posts regarding rates, and auditors, or maybe no paying vendors, unless you are an employee, that is just part of being independent. The other side of the independent coin is being able to go out and make more in one deployment than our staff counterparts do in a year. Though there have times with no income, I have made more over the last several years than I would have had I stayed in my previous staff position with farmers. And I got more vacation time.
In my opinion, we could benefit from a good strong association. Ive seen a couple, but they seem to be primarily an outlet for CEU's or yearly conventions, not so much for negotiating standardized rate sheets. I don't know that this group would be cohesive enough to form a good strong association. Just looking through the posts on this forum, you see almost as many different ideas and directions as there are people posting.
JWG | | I know the voices aren't real, but sometimes they're right! | |
| Anthony Deangelo
 Posts:39

 | | 02/04/2008 11:53 AM |
| In answer to the question to a group of adjusters forming a union or such. As a union delegate from way back when in the teamsters I have discussed this in depth with James Hoffa Jr. and my cousin who is number 2 in the teamsters and he handles all the contract and benifits negoations. In my talks I have found that as adjusters with a union behind us the benifits are great. We will have representation with both the carriers and ia firms.There will no way an ia firm would be allowed to not pay their adjusters and with collective bargining we would have contracts that are to our advantage. It would set standards for training and allow us the health and unemployment benifits that we should be allowed as american workers. Also the carriers would be held accountable for timley payments to the ia firms and the ia firms would be held accountable for full payments to all adjusters. And we would have access to delagates and lawyers who will stand up and fight for us. But lets get honest at least 80% of adjusters fight this idea as they feel that doing it by themselves is to their advantage. But lets look back at the threads dealing with bad ia firms and whatnot. These practices would not be allowed and every ia firm would be held accountable. The power of the union as a whole is better then a group of us complaining on this site and not achieving any results.doing it one person at a time. Just look at how many adjusters have still not been paid for loses they worked in new orleans and surrounding areas. with a union delegate the ia firms would be held accountable to and have to justify to the union lawyer why the adjusters have not been paid when they have already been paiid.. the union would set up standards that we as adjusters and the firms that hire us have to live by thus making our employment more desirable to clients.The power of the union would force the bad apples out of the industry. But in all honesty this is just my opinion and I already know the negative reaction this statement will bring in our community.but untill we as a group decide to take this matter head on and realize that there is strenth in numbers nothing in our industry relating to adjusters will change. We are not leaders in the industry we are disposible to ia firms and carriers and the past 2 years prove it. With collective bargining our industry will see an increase in quality,experianced adjusters getting the positions that they deserve and with the big guns from forming a group like this there will be no more fighting for money from bad ia firms.. Also unions can get us to be w-2 contract for a deployment thus relieving us of the tax burden at the end of the year. And it also gives us a voice in our industry that will be heard far and wide. being in a union or anyother group does not make you less of an independant but more of a group of professionals that have a voice and power. No one says that you can not pick and choose your assignments but what they are saying is that we should have the same rights as every one else that works as a group in an industry. Wouldn't it be nice if we could have the power for health insurance , 401k benifits and retirement plans for our futures. I know the negatives that other adjusters wil voice allI am doing is putting out there another idea with teeth that will help us in these changing times and make our profession one that people and the industry will respect and take notice of. Change is good why even migrant farm workers have a union so why shouldn't we have some thing similar? | | | |
| k'ung Fu-tzu
 Posts:29

 | | 02/05/2008 7:42 AM |
| I would fight a union with everything in my power. I don't need anyone or any 'body' to negotiate my contracts, secure benefits, establish rules and regulations and I sure as hell ain't going to pay anyone a fee to do it. The only 'voice' I want heard it mine, not as a group with a selected speaker.
There was a movement around 1988 for the same rhetoric and it was fought vehemently. | | | |
| Terry Lee
 Posts:3

 | | 02/05/2008 10:14 AM |
| Once again the word union is mentioned. I never in a million yrs thought I would say this but a Union is needed for us. It would at least open the eyes of the all the IA companys and maybe we could get 70%, 100 claims when we travel to a storm. You know the old days that was the 1st question you asked am I going to get 100claims. If you did not you stayed home, cause you werent going to be making anymore than a WalMart greeter. The whole point to the pay we get is to make it thru the slow times but be on call all the time. Most of the IA companys have forgot this. The insurance companys have tried to turn us into staff adjusters and work a storm as quick as possible but keep adding more and more for us to do on each claim to where you can't hardly get any thing done. I have heard stories thur the yrs about adjusters traveling across country and sitting there for a week and then sent home with we will make it up next time. A Union could address all theses problems and stop things like that. Safeco use to have a pollicy where you were to get a 75 claims evertime they called you out. I have heard they have stopped that. A Union could start a rotation for working the storms so that all the Uncles,Aunts, brothers and such don't get all the work when we have times like these. Has their been a fee sch change since the gas prices went up. I don't know of any. We tried this while working at the LA Quake, out of 400 IA we only got 27 to come to a meeting about starting a Union. Word was that everybody else was scared of there job. I don't think a standard of 70%, min of 100 claims, compensation for travel with out working, a rotation of some sorts ect is too much to ask for. So in the mean time keep running up those credit cards and hoping that thestorm season will start soon and be a better yr than next. IT IS NOT FAILURE ITSELF THAT HOLDS YOU BACK: IT IS THE FEAR OF FAILURE THAT PARALYZES YOU. | | | |
| Tom Toll Life Member Moderator
 Posts:916

 | | 02/05/2008 10:28 AM |
| I agree with you on the union, I don't like them. They were necessary many years ago, but not now. A good organization, geared toward providing very qualified adjusters would work, however. But there are many like you that want your independence. Of course, nothing would have helped during 06 and 07, there just was not any work to be had. Hopefully 08 will produce some work for the qualified adjusters and old timers like me. We are working a lot of daily claims right now and after working the fires in Ca. for Cunningham Lindsey, at least we are not starving. | | Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts. | |
| Anthony Deangelo
 Posts:39

 | | 02/05/2008 11:09 AM |
| Good morning Tom, Thank you for your post and as i said in the beginning the opposition to a union or group to stand up for us will be the biggest obstical to overcome. The notion that we will lose our independant status is foolish there is nothing in any bylaws of the unions that I have seen that take away your independance. As i have stated over and over again we as indivaduals do not have the power or the money to keep hiring lawyers to collect when IA firms refuse to pay. How many of you out there still haven't been paid in full for work you did 4 years ago during katrina? I have seen the restiance from other adjusters and all I can say is that you must lead a charmed life as to not ever have not been paid for all your claims. An aren't you tired of taking crap from IA firms that control wether or not you work and how many claims you get. But everyone is entitled to their opinion .Unions or organizations that stand up for us may not be right for some people but having been doing this since 1979 all over the country and working for some of the largest IA firms I have found that we are nothing but warm bodies and no thought is giving to our well being on the road. We are just expected to arrive at the scene and do our jobs usally with no firm instructions on how the client is gong to handle the volume and as we progress the procedures change hourly.
In my opinion collective bargining with a large group always works better the one person trying to climb a mountain that they are not familiar with. But again I feel that this is a waste in explaining the advantages of becoming one group as the fear of losing something is greater then trying to make our profession a big and powerful group that will not tolorate the ways of shoddy IA firms and shoddy work from our members.Change does not come easy and for years all i have heard is the complaints that we as adjusters have and no one to stand up for us.So I thank you all for letting me voice my opinion and if the mood changes let me know as I do know how to get the ball rolling and at least set up a meeting to have everyone's questions answered by the professionals. I love what I have been doing all my life but I feel that we are taken advantage of and have no way to defend our selves. And the biggest point of all is that with a lagre organization behind us the cost of health benifits that work for all our family memebers will be affordable as well as retirement benifits for the future.So agin my fellow adjusters I thank you for allowing me to voice my opinion on the future of our profession.
| | | |
| k'ung Fu-tzu
 Posts:29

 | | 02/05/2008 12:11 PM |
| Anthony,
You articulate the benefits quite well and as expected of someone that advocates union membership. The belief or disbelief in the union system for adjusters in my opinion is purely philisophical. I've heard all of your above arguments before and the word 'adjuster' can be substituted for 'teamster', "UAW', whatever. The bottom line is whether or not an individual wishes to give up their rights in exchange for collective bargaining. Sort of signing away your right to negotiate to a third party. I would choose to NOT give that right away. I'll negotiate with vendors, I'll chase down outstanding payments and I'll make the decision on who I work for. I'm not obliged to any one organization, firm and I sure as heck don't have to pay someone to do those things. I have my own affordable health insurance, disability, and life insurance. It's all available in the free market at a reasonable cost. I've been at this 20+ years and I can tell you if it becomes the 'future' of the business as you say, I'll opt out. I won't subsidize my income for those who can't market themselves because of the 'greater good of the group". I'm a capitalist and I'll stay that way. | | | |
|
| | You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
| |
ActiveForums 3.7 |
|  |
| |
| |
|
 | | Adjuster Chat Room Activity | |
| |
| | |
|
|
| |
|  | |
|
|  |  |  |  |
|