Sunday, September 07, 2008
AdjustersTraining.com Miami Sept 6 - 7
Current Topics


Catastrophe Central
Subject: Katrina Latest
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.

AuthorMessages
Wes DavisUser is Offline

Lighthouse Point Florida
Member
Posts:53


03/18/2007 11:03 AM  
Joe has been hanging out on the causeway to Honeymoon Island. LOL

On a related note for your area. Wait until Tampa Bay finally gets hit by the big one. Oldsmar and many other areas will disappear under storm surge.
Rocke BakerUser is Offline

Michigan
Member
Posts:50


03/18/2007 5:52 PM  
Meg & Joe

Meg, it is the state and local goverments that want these mansions, hi-rises and other items built on these islands. It means very large tax money for them on very little land. Since they do not have to cover any issues relating to storm damage to these buildings, little do they care.

Joe, I agree that FEMA or the US goverment has no business insuring these properties. Let the states, counties and municipalities insure them. Very doubtful any of these buildings would be built is local's had to cover them...
joseph lombardo jr.User is Offline
Adjuster
Clearwater, Florida
Member
Posts:112


03/19/2007 7:17 AM  
Wes,
At one time I lived on Boca Ciega Bay....beautiful unti the March 13th, 1993 no name storm.......

We now live in Clearwater, on a hill and our elevation is 37' 4" above sea level.......like I said, Momma drowned the stupid ones.......oh, and we were at 8' above sea level at the Boca Ciega house.....
Ray HallUser is Offline
Adjuster
Houston, TX
Member
Posts:808


03/19/2007 11:58 AM  

If the tax payers had a voice I am sure most would abolish the present day NFIP program. MOST of the flood claims paid last year and the year before was to buildings that were flooded before, some flooded several times.  This is insane for the Fed's to insure buildings that flood over and over and over.

I think flood insurance on sea coast land should cost as much a yacht policy without long enough mooring lines. Something like 5% of the value per year. . Let the rich owners pay the premium not the poor working slobs, like us.

Tom TollUser is Offline
Life Member
Moderator
Member
Posts:916


03/19/2007 1:09 PM  
I agree with Ray and Joe. It is ridiculous for NFIP to continually cover properties that flood over and over. It is the general public's tax that ends up paying for the bulk of these losses, primarily because NFIP does not have a premium base high enough for these flood prone areas. Beach property should have very high premium bases. Why should we have to pay for their wanting to live on the water.

Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.
Ray HallUser is Offline
Adjuster
Houston, TX
Member
Posts:808


03/20/2007 1:19 PM  

Have you heard the story about the "adjusters flood house".  The house was on the banks of Caney Creek in South Montgomery County, TX. yep just outside New Caney on the East side. All the old flood adjusters know this area.

He worked the first flood claim on the house when NFIP started writing flood insurance.  He drove by a year later and  the house all grown up with weeds and vacant.  He pulled his old file found the owner and purchased the house as is for $20,000. He spent about 2 week ends cutting out rot mold etc and about 5 large pails of latex. He would find a local tenant for $800. per month and collect about 10-15 thousand ever other year until 1994 when the creek water was over the ridge and he had to disclose the damage was over 50% of the value and no longer eligable for flood insurance. He collected a total loss of $60,000 and sold the lot for $7,000.

Now this is better than the school that cost $199.00 on how to make money on real estate. All you people who use this method please send me my $199.00

PS. Some problems arise on rebuilding  as the job built cabinets and hollow core doors will not be held togather by latex paint more than five times. And you have to start over again.

David HoutzUser is Offline
Adjuster
Member
Posts:42


03/21/2007 8:51 AM  
Read this morning that SF has agreed to "review" 35,000 Mississippi claims. The question I have this morning, who is SF going to get to "review" these claims??????
Who in the world would want to get into the middle of this bunch of lies.


David Houtz
Laine DebrowUser is Offline

Purvis, MS
Member
Posts:29


03/21/2007 10:20 AM  
I have heard that these claims will be reviewed by SF employees only.  When I first heard that they were doing this, I thought for a second it might mean potential work for some lucky independents.  Then I quickly had the same thought as you...who would wanna get in the middle of this mess?!

Old fishermen never die, they just smell that way.
Deborah MoroyUser is Offline
Adjuster
Nationwide
Member
Posts:168


03/28/2007 5:40 PM  

Scruggs Katrina group sued over attorney fees by a partner in the group(per article):

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/03/27/ap3556661.html


Visit our Adjusters Information Blog
www.dimechimes.wordpress.com
Steve BeaumontUser is Offline
Founding Member
Adjuster
Homeless Gypsy's-Fulltime RV travelers
Member
Posts:284


03/28/2007 10:27 PM  
Here is an article on what SF and Travelers recently filed in New Orleans to try and exclude policyholders that took out SBA loans from going forward with lawsuits against the carriers. An interesting move which is a matter of law that the courts will have to decide. I'm still trying to figure out whether the decision makers on this move are incredibly smart or incredibly stupid, but one thing is for sure, this may turn out to be the biggest PR fiasco they have ever pulled.

http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-7/1175060682126840.xml&coll=1
You are not authorized to post a reply.



ActiveForums 3.7


Adjuster Chat Room Activity
Room:Users
The Den1



MyProfile

Introducing  "MyProfile", your space on CADO, create it, arrange it, share it! 
Click here to create your page!



Search CADO
  Google Custom Search


Home | Bulletins | Classifieds | Forums | Adjusters | Channels | Directory | Cado | Marketplace
Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use  
Copyright 1995-2007 by CatAdjuster.org Adjuster to Adjuster