Thursday, December 04, 2008
USAA Certification Classes 1
Catastrophe Central
Post Removed
Last Post 15 Nov 2006 02:26 AM by Roy Cupps. 8 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
Roy CuppsUser is Offline
CatAdjuster.org
Member
Member
Send Private Message
Posts:359

--
06 Nov 2006 10:56 PM  

 I have temporary removed this thread. I will restore it later.

 

One policy I have "is no name calling".  Calling someone a name will be grounds for temporary or full removal of posting rights. There ways to disagree and to get your point across without the name calling and insults.

People please respect other users.  In some cases people make accusations about users that they do not even know and are totally unfounded.

Adjuster Directory | The Licensing Page | The Cane Page
Larry ReganUser is Offline
Member
Member
Send Private Message
Posts:60

--
07 Nov 2006 05:10 AM  

You decide

ebrooks

Member

Total Posts: 144
Last Post: 11/6/2006
Member Since: 3/18/2006

 

The following post was received on 7-1-06 and remains on the site at this time:

"Did you try the Careers Forum- this site has excellent job opportunities as does www.greatinsurancejobs.com and www.claims-portal.com . We are also listing all of the trainee jobs we learn of at www.claimSmentor.com for our trainees that are newly licensed. This site does require preapproval for registration by sending your resume/cc of adjusters license to claimSmentorcom@aol.com. Preregistration is required as the site is only for adjusters or adjusting firms and carriers and we verify id as we don't accept membership under false id's as some forums do to keep it professional.

Deborah K Ward, AIC, II Founder- Dimechimes Corporation Founder www.claimSmentor.com"

If you go to "claimSmentorcom" you will find an operation which recruits "mentors" to donate their services to teach trainee adjusters . On the face of it, at least, this operation is philanthropic. So it does not appear to involve getting a job, it involves training to get a job.

I contacted this operation and had a brief email correspondence with their representative. This interaction led me to conclude that this operation was not something I wanted to get involved with. I will provide you with an excerpt from the actual statement from the "claimsmentor" representative, although of course you may wish to contact them directly:

"We require a resume and Id verification. That is because the site is closed to those who are Independents or staff adjuster trainees or new adjusters interested in either. The site is not open to contractors, public adjusters, or others who just work with those in our industry. We require the ID as we don't allow people to register with false ID's to keep the site professional and we all like it that way. That is why so many IA firms are agreeable to helping us with mentoring as we don't play games.we are here to help and we are trying to keep it professional.We want the trainees to prepare themselves for the serious business dealing in Claims and understand it for the true profession that it is. I have had no objections from but 1 or 2 who didn't want to supply ID which is fine. We don't want those who do have a problem verifying ID."

I would be interested in any information or experience you may develop from the "claimsmentor" operation of a positive nature.

 

mh0825

Member

Total Posts: 2
Last Post: 7/19/2006
Member Since: 7/6/2006

I believe I can shed some light on Mr. Brooks' post.

As one of the creators of Claims Mentor I have some information that may find it very helpful for you all.  Mr. Brooks contacted us about becoming a mentor to help out newer adjusters.  In Mr. Books' first email to us he had mentioned that he was interested in being reimbursed for his time that he spent on mentoring.  I would like to clarify right here and now, that not one member on our site is directly reimbursed by Claims Mentor for their services they offer.  There may be indirect compensation but that is something that we cannot control.

 

ebrooks

Member

Total Posts: 144
Last Post: 11/6/2006
Member Since: 3/18/2006

The Progressive test sounds a lot like the test my first claims employer gave me. They try to make it as close to the real thing as possible. It’s an aptitude test, no preparation necessary or even helpful.

Adjusters are generalists. A jack of all trades. But able to bring reasoning to bear that specialists may not have. A premium on common sense judgments.

It’s an interesting job, at least in the field. I kept at it for a number of years. I don’t think I could have lasted in a "real job" for anywhere near that long.

Now I travel from courtroom to courtroom representing criminal defendants. Not a "real job" either. Too much fun to be a real job.

Quite a bit of pressure in both jobs, but that’s the price you pay for all the fun–in fact in a way it's part of the fun

EB

 

 

As an adjuster I will cast my vote with Kevin any day over that of a lawyer.

This is suppose to be a web site for adjusters.

I would like membership to be as restrictive as CLaimsmentor.com. I do not feel we should open a website dedicated to adjusters to the public. as in lawyers,insureds, contractors, PA's-homeowners or anyone else not directly related to the adjuster community.

 

 

Gale HawkinsUser is Offline
PowerClaim.com
Member
Member
Send Private Message
Posts:366

--
07 Nov 2006 07:31 AM  

Larry, while this thread went off subject with your post and then mine there seems to be some confusion on your part as to what CADO is to be to the industry. It seems to me that Roy has clearly started his purpose for CADO and how it is going to be run. Roy is kind to permit many different views to be expressed.  Roy has some simple guidelines which we all agree to so as to have the privilege to post on CADO, his website. You stated you would cast your vote with Kevin but I missed what Roy had put up to be voted on by the visitors to his site. I realize it being Election Day and all that perhaps you were speaking metaphorically.    

Roy CuppsUser is Offline
CatAdjuster.org
Member
Member
Send Private Message
Posts:359

--
07 Nov 2006 11:59 AM  
Gale there was nothing to vote on. 
Adjuster Directory | The Licensing Page | The Cane Page
Deborah MoroyUser is Offline
Member
Member
Send Private Message
Posts:171
Avatar

--
07 Nov 2006 02:00 PM  

Larry, aren't those quotes from MH0825 and Ebrooks copies from www.claimspages.com forums where Mr Brooks copy and pasted portions of emails to our claimSmentor email and responses? Per the Catadjuster.org terms, I dont believe Roy allows quotes taken from emails?

We at www.ClaimSmentor.com do not wish to get into another email campaign nor forum dispute with Mr Brooks about our policies at ClaimSmentor requiring adjuster id after he didn't wish to participate and subsequent argumentative emails  and comments directed regarding our policy requiring adjuster status id verification and since the post violates Cado new terms of service by including direct email quotes, I hope the post and topic here commenting on claimSmentor are withdrawn.

All adjusters and adjusting firms interested in positive mentoring relationships with trainee adjusters as well as carriers are welcome to participate at www.claimSmentor.com once preapproval documents are sent to claimSmentorcom@aol.com to verify adjuster status. Information on new registration is explained on our FORUMS tab page.

Visit our Adjusters Information Blog
www.dimechimes.wordpress.com
Justin DuckworthUser is Offline
New Forum User
New Forum User
Send Private Message
Posts:2

--
07 Nov 2006 03:43 PM  
I agree with Larry, and Kevin. And Deborah, apparently the rules here are "flexible".
Roy CuppsUser is Offline
CatAdjuster.org
Member
Member
Send Private Message
Posts:359

--
07 Nov 2006 04:24 PM  
Justin,

Can you please explain what rules you are talking about. Deborah's post is aimed at Larry for posting a post from another forum owned and operated by someone else that contained quotes from emails. Larry's comments as I see them has nothing to do with the name calling rule but is about who should be able to post on CADO. I do not see any change in the "rules" and not sure where you get the "flexible" part. I wish to give the poster in this case Larry a chance to make the changes as requested by Deborah, if Larry decides that the CADO rule about posting "quotes" from emails does not apply to the post he made then it becomes a moderator issue.
Adjuster Directory | The Licensing Page | The Cane Page
Deborah MoroyUser is Offline
Member
Member
Send Private Message
Posts:171
Avatar

--
07 Nov 2006 04:44 PM  
Thanks for the comments Roy. My only intention posting was only to avoid any continued "discussions" with Mr Brooks regarding our site membership. Larry hadn't actually said anything wrong by copying the claimspages.com forums posts ....I just do not wish to "rehash" our membership requirements on a public forum thus the request to remove atleast the portion where an email quote was used in the post.
Visit our Adjusters Information Blog
www.dimechimes.wordpress.com
Roy CuppsUser is Offline
CatAdjuster.org
Member
Member
Send Private Message
Posts:359

--
15 Nov 2006 02:26 AM  
The discussion on Computerize Estimating as been moved to here > http://www.catadjuster.org/Forums/tabid/60/forumid/27/postid/401/view/topic/Default.aspx
Adjuster Directory | The Licensing Page | The Cane Page
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Active Forums 4.1


Adjuster Chat Room Activity
Room:Users
The Den 1



MyProfile

Introducing  "MyProfile", your space on CADO, create it, arrange it, share it! 
Click here to create your page!



An Adjuster to Adjuster Community

Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use
Copyright 1995-2007 by CatAdjuster.org Adjuster to Adjuster