Posted By Eric Kraft on 05/09/2008 12:04 AM I would like to know what types other adjusters use; pin or pin-less and what is recommended..... For 18 years I used a pin type, got it after about the 3rd property loss because I did not want the Water Suckers to have better equipment, or tell me what was or wasn't still wet. After that, I felt "blind" if I didn't bring my moisture probe with me. Ray is right about Cat losses, usually it's too late by the time you get there to have the probe be of much use. But on daily claims I consider them vital. We had a thread on this subject recently, right after 2 claims where I realized I needed a better meter. 
Here is my old "pin" type moisture probe. I knew it was wet here, this is where the refrigerator ice maker line failed. 
Around the corner, wasn't sure if the water went that far, my probe confirmed water trapped behind the base. Think about it, my photo with probe says that I determined it was wet. You don't see stains, the bullnose isn't screwed up like it was closer to the source, so this is the only way to say it in a photo that it is damaged. But I had no idea water was trapped under the tile (on a wood sub-floor deck) because I didn't have a non-penetrating moisture meter. 
Other side of the wall from the fridge, my probe found no moisture at the base, my prelim report said no damage to this room. 
This is the same room, after an emergency service contractor that I respect determined moisture was under the surface, using a Tramex Encounter Plus non-penetrating moisture meter. It's $355 at Amazon.com and is the lower priced one with analog needle, but is an upgrade of a dependable model. 

Closer in, look at the water ring on the wood sheathing. 

Closer in. I had no freak'in idea the water had run out this far, under the wood floor. Despite my "pin type" meter I was truly blind, and this could have been a liability for ME PERSONALLY in terms of mold remediation that would not have been covered by the carrier (low limit). The Emg Services contractor actually saved me from embarrassment and potential financial loss, E&O type issues because it was aggressively dried out before turning into a petri dish. Which isn't covered anymore... 
The wood sub-floor had water trapped under the hardwood finished floor AND THE TILE FLOOR in the kitchen, all the way out to here. It has a water ring, and this was not an exaggerated claim by the contractor. That water ran under the tile all the way down the hall at the end of the photo, and tile had to be pulled from a hall bathroom. The non-penetrating meter found where it was, and they just pulled flooring as no other way to dry it. This thing was leaking for 4 days at close of escrow when the fridge was pulled by seller (valve not fully closed) and the new buyer was litigious. Believe me, this would have been ugly if someone didn't have a non-penetrating meter. My "pin-type" would not tell me what was happening under the tile and hardwood floor. It let me down. People that own and use non-penetrating meters tend to rely on them, and don't even reach for the pin-type anymore. And it doesn't leave the "snake bite" holes in the wall (if you do that do dry areas that won't need paint it is embarrassing) |